
The Institutional Markets brief lays out unique opportunities and challenges of sourcing local and regional food for colleges and universities, public and private K-12 schools, early childcare sites, hospitals and healthcare facilities, carceral facilities, long term and elder care facilities, and other institutions that serve food. This Market brief is one of 27 briefs created as part of the NH Food and Agriculture Strategic Plan.

What's at Stake?

Institutions have the ability to transform the local food system by making values-based food commitments that support local and regional farm and food business viability and value chains. In addition to food procurement, institutions wield influence in our food system through education, research, and as major landholders, investors, and employers. An estimated 22% of New Hampshire’s residents rely on institutions for daily meals.1,2 Some of our most vulnerable populations, including children, elderly, healthcare patients, and incarcerated people, who are disproportionately people of color, rely on institutions for some or all of their nutritional needs. Therefore, institutional offerings can determine eating patterns that affect long-term health outcomes.

Current Conditions
New Hampshire has 1,423 institutions serving an estimated 317,260 people, 22% of the state’s population. In 2022, New Hampshire schools and colleges spent about 16% of their total food and beverage budgets on locally produced and manufactured food and beverages, compared to the statewide institutional average of 6.6%.3
Despite interest in and support for local food, institutional markets have limited growth potential for values-based food in New Hampshire without interventions. Institutions are often locked into contracts that dictate the percentage of their food budgets to be spent through predetermined and approved vendors and distributors. They work with Group Purchasing Organizations (GPOs) that bid for foods on a national and international level to ensure low prices.
Food service managers often prefer to buy larger quantities at consistent prices and availability through approved vendors that have insurance and food safety requirements that many small New Hampshire producers cannot meet. Farms in New Hampshire are mostly small, both in terms of acreage and sales; product availability is seasonal and faces increased disruptions due to climate change. New Hampshire farms are mostly white-owned and people of color have limited access to farmland and support, which makes institutional goals of supporting BIPOC farmers challenging.


Challenges
> New Hampshire’s small farms struggle to meet institutional demands for product consistency, price, insurance, and certifications.
> Institutions lack connections to farms and the capacity to build relationships and coordinate logistics.
> A few multinational food service management companies dominate the sector with long-term contracts and major national distributors, making it more labor intensive and expensive for institutions to purchase local foods.
> Federal regulations favor lowest-cost in purchasing bids for public institutions.
> Inadequate and time-consuming tracking and reporting systems for institutional local food procurement make it difficult to establish baseline data and measure progress.
Opportunities
> Significant investments are being made in local food systems in New Hampshire and New England, including:
- Proven training, education, and implementation resources for institutions, farmers, and value-chain actors (i.e., NH Harvest of the Month).
- State and regional networking and collaboration.
- Investments by state and federal agencies and private foundations (i.e., USDA’s Resilient Food System Infrastructure Program grants, the New England Food Vision Prize).
- Interconnected policies and legislation (i.e., the Local Food for Local Schools Purchasing Incentive Pilot Program).
> Food hubs offer institutions access to diverse local products, eliminating the need to coordinate among several producers.
> Some hospitals and colleges sell food through other mediums— retail outlets, catering, and cafés— which allow for higher price point products, in turn covering the higher costs of production for locally produced food.

Recommendations

Organizations working on this issue

Authors
Lead Author
Tania Taranovski, Director of Strategic Initiatives & Partnerships, Farm to Institution New England
Contributing Authors
Katelyn Porter, Value Chain Coordinator, NH Food Alliance, Sustainability Institute, University of New Hampshire
Stacey Purslow, Program Coordinator, NH Farm to School, Sustainability Institute, University of New Hampshire
Tom Serafin, Director of Food Services, Concord Hospital
Brian Cassino, Business Development Manager, Black River Produce
This brief was developed through a participatory process led by the NH Food Alliance, a program of the University of New Hampshire. The brief content is comprised of the opinions, perspectives, and information gathered by the authors and participants, and does not necessarily represent those of the NH Department of Agriculture, Markets, and Food or the NH Food Alliance.

Head to the NH Food and Agriculture Strategic Plan main page to read more briefs, browse recommendations and learn how the strategic plan was created.

References
1 Farm to Institution New England. New England Farm to Institution Metric Dashboard. Dashboard.farmtoinstitution.org. Published March 2015. Accessed October 15, 2024. https://dashboard.farmtoinstitution.org/
2 Estimates of populations spending time at institutions do not include children enrolled in early care programs as these data were not available to include, and do not account for individuals who may spend time at multiple institutions per day (i.e., a hospital patient who is also an early childhood employee).
3 Richardson, S. Harlow, A. Cardwell, N. Porter, K. New Hampshire Local Food Count. New England Feeding New England. Published September 2024. Accessed September 25, 2024. https://nefoodsystemplanners.org/wp-content/uploads/New-Hampshire-Local-Food-Count_2022.pdf